[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091120092324.GA15422@duck.suse.cz>
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 10:23:24 +0100
From: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
To: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ext2: clear uptodate flag on super block I/O error
(v2)
On Thu 19-11-09 10:13:17, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Nov 2009 16:19:53 +0100
> Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz> wrote:
>
> > > + if (buffer_write_io_error(sbh)) {
> > > + /*
> > > + * This happens if USB or floppy device is yanked out.
> > > + * Maybe user put device back in so warn and update again.
> > > + */
> > > + printk(KERN_ERR
> > > + "EXT2-fs: previous I/O error to superblock detected\n");
> > > + clear_buffer_write_io_error(sbh);
> > > + set_buffer_uptodate(sbh);
> > It's not much about puting the device back. It's really just about
> > avoiding the warning in mark_buffer_dirty(). So I'd just silently
> > set_buffer_uptodate and be done with it. For superblock we are darn sure
> > that in memory copy is the one that has the latest data :)
>
> This code mirrors ext4_commit_super, why should ext2 be any different?
OK, my remark was mostly about the comment which is different in ext4 ;).
I'll just fixup the comment and merge the patch. Thanks.
Honza
--
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
SUSE Labs, CR
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists