[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e9e943910911230640v3ec7c15cs4514e7802200a004@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 14:40:52 +0000
From: Duane Griffin <duaneg@...da.com>
To: tytso@....edu
Cc: Andreas Dilger <andreas.dilger@...tre.org>,
Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>,
ext4 development <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ext4: journal superblock modifications in
ext4_statfs()
2009/11/23 <tytso@....edu>:
> On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 11:57:44AM +0000, Duane Griffin wrote:
>> Unfortunately you can't just blindly give back the journalled block:
>> it may have been escaped. So you need to read in the block from the
>> journal, unescape it if required, then give it back.
>
> Good point; this is going to make supporting a read-only mount that
> doesn't replay the journal very difficult to implement for
> data=journal mode, since it would mean intercepting the actual block
> I/O read functions for data reads, which is outside of fs/ext4 in the
> generic fs/ and mm/ functions. Doing it for metadata blocks will be
> annoying, but at least it's all inside fs/ext4.
Yes, that is the sticking point I got to with my last attempt at this :(
I was kinda hoping that someone would have a bright idea that doesn't
involve hacking an IO completion callback into get_block_t...
> - Ted
Cheers,
Duane.
--
"I never could learn to drink that blood and call it wine" - Bob Dylan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists