[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091126132901.GA4834@quack.suse.cz>
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 14:29:01 +0100
From: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, tytso@....edu,
chris.mason@...cle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext2: Report metadata errors during fsync
On Wed 25-11-09 13:48:58, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Nov 2009 11:24:53 +0100
> Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz> wrote:
>
> > When an IO error happens while writing metadata buffers, we should better
> > report it and call ext2_error since the filesystem is probably no longer
> > consistent. Sometimes such IO errors happen while flushing thread does
> > background writeback, the buffer gets later evicted from memory, and thus
> > the only trace of the error remains as AS_EIO bit set in blockdevice's
> > mapping. So we check this bit in ext2_fsync and report the error although
> > we cannot be really sure which buffer we failed to write.
>
> So this doesn't cause significant changes in runtime behaviour unless
> the operator specified errors=remount-ro or errors=panic?
Yes, only log message in case errors=continue. OTOH errors=remount-ro is
IMHO more common. But in case we detect metadata IO error (which is what
I've added), calling ext2_error is desirable regardless of what it ends up
doing.
Honza
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists