[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091209105851.GC4863@quack.suse.de>
Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 11:58:52 +0100
From: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
To: tytso@....edu
Cc: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: writev corruption and 64-bit quota patches for 2.6.33-rc1?
On Tue 08-12-09 16:21:09, tytso@....edu wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 08, 2009 at 12:00:43PM +0100, Jan Kara wrote:
> > Hi Ted,
> >
> > do you plan on merging my fixes for writev filesystem corruption and
> > 64-bit quota patches? The writev patch is independent of any other patch
> > and should go in ASAP, 64-bit quota patch depends on generic quota code
> > change so either I can merge it or you can merge a bit later (it's a small
> > change for ext4).
>
> Why don't I take the writev patch, and let you merge the 64-bit quota
> patch along with the generic quota changes? Does that make sense?
Yes, fine for me. I just didn't want to merge ext4 quota changes without
your approval.
> The only thing that worries me a tiny bit is that there are some quota
> bug fixes which the OpenVZ folks have submitted, that I need to review
> and haven't gotten to yet, and there's a chance they may conflict with
> your 64-bit ext4 quota changes. But I'm sure we can deal with any
> potential merge conflicts should they come up.
Yes, I need to take a look at those as well. So far they don't seem to be
conflicting AFAICS.
Honza
--
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
SUSE Labs, CR
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists