[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6601abe90912100928v747671dat489aeee5dabf2c03@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 09:28:28 -0800
From: Curt Wohlgemuth <curtw@...gle.com>
To: ext4 development <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] ext4: Ensure zeroout blocks have no dirty metadata
This fixes a bug in which new blocks returned from an extent created with
ext4_ext_zeroout() can have dirty metadata still associated with them.
Signed-off-by: Curt Wohlgemuth <curtw@...gle.com>
---
This is for the problem I reported on 23 Nov ("Bug in extent zeroout: blocks
not marked as new"). I'm not seeing the corruption with this fix that I was
seeing without it.
diff -uprN orig/fs/ext4/extents.c new/fs/ext4/extents.c
--- orig/fs/ext4/extents.c 2009-12-09 15:09:25.000000000 -0800
+++ new/fs/ext4/extents.c 2009-12-09 15:09:37.000000000 -0800
@@ -2474,9 +2474,21 @@ static int ext4_ext_zeroout(struct inode
submit_bio(WRITE, bio);
wait_for_completion(&event);
- if (test_bit(BIO_UPTODATE, &bio->bi_flags))
+ /* On success, we need to insure all metadata associated
+ * with each of these blocks is unmapped. */
+ if (test_bit(BIO_UPTODATE, &bio->bi_flags)) {
+ sector_t block = ee_pblock;
+
ret = 0;
- else {
+ done = 0;
+ while (done < len) {
+ unmap_underlying_metadata(inode->i_sb->s_bdev,
+ block);
+
+ done++;
+ block++;
+ }
+ } else {
ret = -EIO;
break;
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists