[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1260569815.21896.24.camel@bobble.smo.corp.google.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 14:16:55 -0800
From: Frank Mayhar <fmayhar@...gle.com>
To: surbhi.palande@...onical.com
Cc: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] replaced BUG() with return
-EIO from ext4_ext_get_blocks
On Sat, 2009-12-12 at 00:11 +0200, Surbhi Palande wrote:
> Hi Frank,
>
> Frank Mayhar wrote:
> > On Fri, 2009-12-11 at 14:02 -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> >
> >> My first thought was that this was a bandaid too, but I guess it can
> >> come about due to on-disk corruption for any reason, so it should
> >> be handled gracefully, and I suppose this approach seems fine.
> >>
> >
> > That's why we've been running with it, yes.
> >
> >
> >> Since this is catching on-disk corruption, though, it'd be better to call
> >> ext4_error() and let the mount-time error-handling policy decide what to do.
> >>
> >> I like having more info but below seems awfully wordy ;) Maybe the first
> >> printk would suffice, and switching it to an ext4_error() would be best,
> >> I think.
> >>
> >
> > Okay, I'll rework the patch a bit and resubmit it.
> >
> Since I published this patch first against a reported upstream bug, I
> will work on the comments and resubmit the patch!
Okay, go for it, thanks.
--
Frank Mayhar <fmayhar@...gle.com>
Google, Inc.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists