[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091229122744.40a4b707@galadriel.home>
Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2009 12:27:44 +0100
From: Emmanuel Florac <eflorac@...ellique.com>
To: Christian Kujau <lists@...dbynature.de>
Cc: xfs@....sgi.com, reiserfs-devel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org,
jfs-discussion@...ts.sourceforge.net,
ext-users <ext3-users@...hat.com>, linux-nilfs@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: benchmark results
Le Thu, 24 Dec 2009 02:31:10 -0800 (PST) vous écriviez:
> - btrfs, ext4 are the overall winners
> - xfs to, but creating/deleting many files was *very* slow
xfs is slow at file creation/deletion if you mount it with barriers on
standard disk drives (not so with hardware RAID controllers).
--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Emmanuel Florac | Direction technique
| Intellique
| <eflorac@...ellique.com>
| +33 1 78 94 84 02
------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists