linux-ext4 - Re: [Bug 14830] When other IO is running sync times go to 10 to 20 minutes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4B55EAC7.3080004@cybericom.co.uk>
Date:	Tue, 19 Jan 2010 17:24:23 +0000
From:	Chris Lee <cslee-list@...ericom.co.uk>
To:	bugzilla-daemon@...zilla.kernel.org
CC:	linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Bug 14830] When other IO is running sync times go to 10 to 20
 minutes



bugzilla-daemon@...zilla.kernel.org wrote:
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14830
>
>
>
>
>
> --- Comment #3 from Michael Godfrey <godfrey@....stanford.edu>  2010-01-18 23:58:09 ---
>   
>> This problem prevents production use of systems using this kernel.
>>     
>
>   
>> evokes a question: Do you have a kernel which behaved better for you? Which
>> one?
>>     
>
> Yes.  RHEL5.4 does not show this problem.  It is the production
> system that works in this environment.
>
> The response above is disappointing.  Is sync response of 20 minutes,
> including several task timeouts to be considered "normal?"
>
>   
>> If you think the time is inappropriately long, we can have a look at it
>> but for that we'd need much more details like amount and nature of data writen
>> (many small files vs a few large ones), time it takes sync to complete, speed
>> of disks for sequential IO...
>>     
>
> I am sorry to have to tell you that in this environment we do not
> deal in exclusively small or large files, we actually have quite a
> few of both. When an rsync which transfers about 50GB of files of
> various sizes is running, the hung condition is continuous until the rsync
> completes.  This is just a pretty typical load.  You could try it
> yourself.  No special sizes of files are required.  I think I
> mentioned that the ext4 LVM is a RAID 50 3ware 9650SE-8LPML,
> with 8 2T drives.  Its throughput for reading and writing is good
> when the system is not locked up.
>
>   
Is it possible that it is something allong the lines of what is 
described at this link:
http://notemagnet.blogspot.com/2008/08/linux-write-cache-mystery.html

If so a runtime adjustment might help you out.

Chris.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html