lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4B59DA16.3060906@redhat.com>
Date:	Fri, 22 Jan 2010 12:02:14 -0500
From:	Ric Wheeler <rwheeler@...hat.com>
To:	Andreas Dilger <adilger@....com>
CC:	Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>, tytso@....edu,
	ext4 development <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>,
	Bill Nottingham <notting@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] default max mount count to unused

On 01/22/2010 03:09 AM, Andreas Dilger wrote:
> On 2010-01-21, at 20:37, Eric Sandeen wrote:
>> That sounds fine, as do mke2fs.conf hooks, as does a nice shipped script
>> to do background checking of snapshots.
>>
>> But I still don't know why "You mounted your fs 20 times" is a good
>> proxy for "you had better check for corruption now."  Have we so
>> little faith?  :)
>
>
> I've thought for quite a while that 20 mounts is too often, but I'm 
> reluctant to turn it off completely.  I wouldn't object to increasing 
> it to 60 or 80.
>
> At one time there was a patch that checked the state of the filesystem 
> at mount time and only incremented only 1/5 of the time (randomly) if 
> it was unmounted cleanly (not dirty, or not in recovery), but every 
> time if it crashed.  The reasoning was that systems which crashed are 
> more likely to have memory corruption or software bugs, and ones that 
> shut down cleanly are less likely to have such problems.
>

I do like the snapshot idea, but also think that we need something will 
not introduce random (potentially multi-hour or multi-day) fsck runs 
after an otherwise clean reboot.

If we hit this with a combination of:

Reboot time:
     (1) Try to mount the file system
     (1) on mount failure, fsck the failed file system

While up and running, do a periodic check with the snapshot trick.

I think that would balance the fear that we have of creeping corruption 
(or at least severe corruption) against the need to be speedy when 
rebooting....

ric

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ