[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100125090243.GA28459@thunk.org>
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 04:02:43 -0500
From: tytso@....edu
To: "Aneesh Kumar K. V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>, cmm@...ibm.com,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -V2] ext4: unmap the underlying metadata when
allocating blocks via fallocate
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 10:42:05AM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K. V wrote:
> My goal was to see if we can drop the BH_New flag when returning
> preallocated blocks. But now i look at it again i guess you don't need
> to take this patch. We cannot unmap underlying meta data during
> fallocate because even if we remove the old mapping for the blocks,
> we could reboot and later somebody(e2fsprogs) can directly read the blocks
> and create a bh with old data. So i guess we should be doing
> unmap_underlying_blocks when we are returning blocks to userspace or
> when we actually zero out blocks.
OK, so I'll drop this patch from the patch queue, and will do a full
test run (XFSQA -g auto using both 1k and 4k block sizes) of the
following patches:
Aneesh Kumar K.V (3):
ext4: Handle -EDQUOT error on write
ext4: Fix quota accounting error with fallocate
ext4: Drop EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_UPDATE_RESERVE_SPACE flag
Of all of the patches in the ext4 patch queue, these seem to be the
ones which need to be urgently pushed to Linus before 2.6.33.
Any objections, or nominations for other patches that should go in
before 2.6.33, please speak up now...
- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists