[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100130105236.GA18286@infradead.org>
Date: Sat, 30 Jan 2010 05:52:36 -0500
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...deen.net>
Cc: xfs-oss <xfs@....sgi.com>,
ext4 development <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfstests: 223 - test file alignment on stripe geometry
> +# real QA test starts here
> +_supported_fs xfs ext4
I'd make this generic and just do the notrun in scratch_mkfs_geom for
non-supported filesystems.
> +scratch_mkfs_geom()
> +{
And I'd throw this one into common.rc.
> +=== Testing size 1073745920 falloc on 128k stripe ===
> +SCRATCH_MNT/file-1073745920-falloc: well-aligned
> diff --git a/common.rc b/common.rc
> index 6424871..97513cc 100644
> --- a/common.rc
> +++ b/common.rc
> @@ -292,7 +292,7 @@ _scratch_mkfs()
> $MKFS_UDF_PROG $MKFS_OPTIONS $* $SCRATCH_DEV > /dev/null
> ;;
> *)
> - /sbin/mkfs -t $FSTYP -- $MKFS_OPTIONS $* $SCRATCH_DEV > /dev/null
> + /sbin/mkfs -t $FSTYP -- $MKFS_OPTIONS $* $SCRATCH_DEV
Hmm, doesn't this change break other testcase? Anyway needs some
rationale in the changelog.
> index 0000000..fa005b2
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/src/fibmap.c
This is a bit misnamed as it's not a generic fibmap tool but rather
a specific tool comparing the bmap to the sunit alignment.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists