[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4B6710B2.9020701@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 01 Feb 2010 11:34:42 -0600
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>
To: "Aneesh Kumar K. V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
CC: paul.chavent@...c.net, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: What represent 646345728 bytes
Aneesh Kumar K. V wrote:
> On Mon, 1 Feb 2010 15:08:24 +0100 (CET), <paul.chavent@...c.net> wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> I'am writing an application that write a stream of pictures of fixed size on a disk.
>>
>> My app run on a self integrated gnu/linux (based on a 2.6.31.6-rt19 kernel).
>>
>> My media is formated with
>>
>> # mke2fs -t ext4 -L DATA -O large_file,^has_journal,extent -v /dev/sda3
>> [...]
>>
>> And it is mounted with
>>
>> # mount -t ext4 /dev/sda3 /var/data/
>> EXT4-fs (sda3): no journal
>> EXT4-fs (sda3): delayed allocation enabled
>> EXT4-fs: file extents enabled
>> EXT4-fs: mballoc enabled
>> EXT4-fs (sda3): mounted filesystem without journal
>>
>> My app opens the file with "O_WRONLY | O_CREAT | O_TRUNC | O_SYNC | O_DIRECT" flags.
>>
>> Each write takes ~4.2ms for 304K (it is very good since it is the write bandwidth of my hard drive). There is a write every 100ms.
>>
>> But every exactly 646345728 bytes, the write takes ~46ms.
>
> I guess that would be balance_dirty_pages starting to writeback the
> delayed allocated pages. You can try if that changes by changing
> /proc/sys/vm/dirty_ratio
But he's doing direct IO...
-Eric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists