linux-ext4 - Re: [PATCH V2] fix type of "offset" in ext4_io

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20100205163417.GP25885@thunk.org>
Date:	Fri, 5 Feb 2010 11:34:17 -0500
From:	tytso@....edu
To:	Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>
Cc:	ext4 development <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>, fmayhar@...gle.com,
	Giel de Nijs <giel@...torwise.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] fix type of "offset" in ext4_io_end

On Fri, Feb 05, 2010 at 08:37:51AM -0500, tytso@....EDU wrote:
> So I was going to submit this patch to Linus, but the last two times
> I've run xfsqa ("xfsqa -g quick" and "xfsqa -g auto"), test #126 has
> failed.  If I run the test stand-alone, it passes.  It's a bit of a
> head-scratcher.  I'm currently backing out the patch and trying to do
> an xfsqa -g auto run to make sure this was something that had crept in
> before applying this patch, so this may very well not be this patch
> --- I certainly can't see anything wrong with it.  But I thought I
> would give a heads up....

Eric and I did more looking at this, and looks like it's a busted
test.  So we're considering this a false alarm for now.

(Safety Pup says: "Null terminate your arguments to fopen!")

	    	  		       - Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html