| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20100222180246.GA3112@quack.suse.cz> Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2010 19:02:47 +0100 From: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz> To: Theodore Tso <tytso@....EDU> Cc: toshi.okajima@...fujitsu.com, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, adilger@....com, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC] do you want jbd2 interface of ext3? On Mon 22-02-10 08:55:53, Theodore Tso wrote: > As for quota --- quite seriously --- if you have mission critical users, > I'd suggest that they not use quota. Dimitry has been turning up all > sorts of bugs in the quota subsystem, many of which are just as > applicable to ext3. The real issue is that quota hasn't received as much > testing as other file system features --- in any file system, not just > ext4. I don't agree with this. I know about quite a few large customers depending on quotas on their servers and they run on ext3 / reiserfs quite happily. Dmitry's patches touching the generic code were mostly cleanups, the fixes were just in the delayed allocation handling but that never gets executed for ext3 or reiserfs... I don't say there cannot be bugs and certainly quota code has less exposure than other more used filesystem parts. But I don't know about any serious quota issue on ext3 / reiserfs in last two years or so (except the one that was caused by Dmitry's fixes ;). Honza -- Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz> SUSE Labs, CR -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists