[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100302131532.GF6077@thunk.org>
Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2010 08:15:32 -0500
From: tytso@....edu
To: Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@...nvz.org>
Cc: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ext4: quota_write cross block boundary behaviour
On Tue, Mar 02, 2010 at 12:37:43PM +0300, Dmitry Monakhov wrote:
> Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz> writes:
>
> > On Tue 16-02-10 19:33:41, Dmitry Monakhov wrote:
> >> We always assume what dquot update result in changes in one data block
> >> But ext4_quota_write() function may handle cross block boundary writes
> >> In fact if this ever happen it will result in incorrect journal credits
> >> reservation. And later bug_on triggering. As soon this never happen the
> >> boundary cross loop is NOOP. In order to make things straight
> >> let's remove this loop and assert cross boundary condition.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@...nvz.org>
> > Yeah, originally I thought it might be useful to support a possibility of
> > multiblock writes but in the end we never needed it and currently e.g. OCFS2
> > would already BUG on that so yes, this is a good simplification.
> > Acked-by: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
> >
> > I've merged the ext3 version of the patch into my tree. Ted, will you
> > merge this ext4 cleanup please?
> Ted please take a look at the patch.
Sorry, I had lost track of this patch. I've added it to the ext4 patch queue.
- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists