[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100302093431.GB5106@lst.de>
Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2010 10:34:31 +0100
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Cc: Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@...nvz.org>,
Camille Moncelier <pix@...life.org>,
"linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
ext4 development <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>, hch@....de,
viro@...iv.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: [ext3] Changes to block device after an ext3 mount point has been remounted readonly
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 05:56:46PM +0100, Jan Kara wrote:
> OK, I see that in theory a process can open file for writing after
> fs_may_remount_ro() before MS_RDONLY flag gets set. That could be really
> nasty.
Not just in theory, but also in practice. We can easily hit this under
load with XFS.
> But by no means we should solve this VFS problem by spilling error
> messages from the filesystem.
Exactly.
> Al, Christoph, do I miss something or there is really nothing which
> prevents a process from opening a file after the fs_may_remount_ro() check
> in do_remount_sb()?
No, there is nothing. We really do need a multi-stage remount read-only
process:
1) stop any writes from userland, that is opening new files writeable
2) stop any periodic writeback from the VM or filesystem-internal
3) write out all filesystem data and metadata
4) mark the filesystem fully read-only
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists