lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 5 Mar 2010 17:46:58 +0100
From:	Leonard Michlmayr <leonard.michlmayr@...il.com>
To:	Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>
Cc:	Ext4 Developers List <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/28] ext4: correctly calculate number of blocks for 
	fiemap

2010/3/5 Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>
>
> > Thank you for pointing this out. I had not checked s_maxbytes.
> > Appearently s_maxbytes can be 1<<(32 + s_blocksize_bits) - 1. Therefore
> > the number of blocks in a file cannot be stored in a 32bit integer.
>
> For extent-based files it had better be....
>
> struct ext4_extent {
>        __le32  ee_block;       /* first logical block extent covers */
>        __le16  ee_len;         /* number of blocks covered by extent */
>
> The start block can't be more than 32 bits; this essentially limits
> the file size / maximum logical block to 2^32 blocks right?
>
> s_maxbytes comes out to 17592186044415
>
> 2^32 4k blocks is 17592186044416 bytes, or max byte offset 17592186044415
>
> What am I missing?  (confusion between max byte count and max
> byte offset, perhaps?)
>

Yes. The block offset has the maximum value 1<<32 - 1.
However the number of blocks may be 1<<32.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ