[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4B94367E.9080506@garzik.org>
Date: Sun, 07 Mar 2010 18:27:58 -0500
From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
To: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
CC: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Akira Fujita <a-fujita@...jp.nec.com>
Subject: defrag deployment status (was Re: [PATCH] ext4: allow defrag (EXT4_IOC_MOVE_EXT)
in 32bit compat mode)
On 03/07/2010 03:32 PM, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> I have an x86_64 kernel with i386 userspace. e4defrag fails on the
> EXT4_IOC_MOVE_EXT ioctl because it is not wired up for the compat
> case. It seems that struct move_extent is compat save, only types
> with fixed widths are used:
> {
> __u32 reserved; /* should be zero */
> __u32 donor_fd; /* donor file descriptor */
> __u64 orig_start; /* logical start offset in block for orig */
> __u64 donor_start; /* logical start offset in block for donor */
> __u64 len; /* block length to be moved */
> __u64 moved_len; /* moved block length */
> };
>
> Lets just wire up EXT4_IOC_MOVE_EXT for the compat case.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger<borntraeger@...ibm.com>
> CCed: Akira Fujita<a-fujita@...jp.nec.com>
I'm curious, what is the overall deployment status of ext4 defragging?
I actually worked on this problem years ago[1], and am hopeful that I
will see defragging in a Linux distribution sometime in my lifetime! ;-)
Looking at Fedora rawhide, I do not see anything resembling e4defrag in
any of the RPM packages like e2fsprogs.
Thanks to everyone working on this,
Jeff
[1] http://linux.yyz.us/misc/ext2meta.c
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists