[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201003081700.57245.borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2010 17:00:57 +0100
From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>
To: David Newall <davidn@...idnewall.com>
Cc: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Akira Fujita <a-fujita@...jp.nec.com>
Subject: Re: defrag deployment status (was Re: [PATCH] ext4: allow defrag (EXT4_IOC_MOVE_EXT) in 32bit compat mode)
Am Montag 08 März 2010 16:33:46 schrieb David Newall:
> Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> > Some bigger things are missing in the e4defrag tool:
> > ...
> > - overall layout considerations (e.g. putting files close to its directory or
> > use the atime to move often used files to the beginning of a disk etc.)
>
> Shouldn't oft-used files be placed closer to the middle? If you place
> them at the beginning of the file, it's only possible for the head-stack
> to be close to the file from the inner direction. Place them in the
> middle and it's possible for the head-stack to be close from the outer
> direction, too, which sounds like a doubling of probability. It seems
> that it's the least frequently used files that should be placed at one
> end of the disk or the other.
>
Maybe. This was just an example of things that you can come
up with and which are not yet possible up in e4defrag.
Christian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists