[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1003121227040.13248@wong.science-computing.de>
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 12:37:31 +0100 (CET)
From: Karsten Weiss <K.Weiss@...ence-computing.de>
To: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>
cc: Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@...nvz.org>,
"linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org" <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Bad ext4 sync performance on 16 TB GPT partition
Hi Eric!
On Mon, 1 Mar 2010, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> > Sorry for the delay, here's the (good) 2.6.32 result:
> >
> > # /usr/bin/time bash -c "dd if=/dev/zero of=/mnt/large/10GB bs=1M count=10000 && sync"
> > 10000+0 records in
> > 10000+0 records out
> > 10485760000 bytes (10 GB) copied, 46.3369 seconds, 226 MB/s
> > 0.00user 14.17system 0:59.53elapsed 23%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 6224maxresident)k
> > 0inputs+0outputs (0major+1045minor)pagefaults 0swaps
> >
> > To summarize:
> >
> > Bad: 2.6.18-164.el5 (CentOS)
> > Bad: 2.6.18-164.11.1el5 (CentOS)
> > Bad: 2.6.18-190.el5 (RH)
> > Good: 2.6.32
> > Good: 2.6.33
In the meantime I've also reproduced the problem on another machine with a
Red Hat 5.5 Beta (x86_64) installation and decided to open a bug on RH's
bugzilla:
Bad ext4 sync performance on 16 TB GPT partition
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=572930
> Thanks, I'll have to investigate that. I guess something may have gotten lost
> in translation in the 2.6.32->2.6.18 backport.....
Did you come up with anything I could test?
Is anyone else able to reproduce the problem?
--
Karsten Weiss
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists