[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4BAF6FB7.601@redhat.com>
Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2010 10:03:19 -0500
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>
To: jing zhang <zj.barak@...il.com>
CC: linux-ext4 <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>,
"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>, Andreas Dilger <adilger@....com>,
Dave Kleikamp <shaggy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"Aneesh Kumar K. V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext4: add rb_tree cache to struct ext4_group_info
jing zhang wrote:
> From: Jing Zhang <zj.barak@...il.com>
>
> Date: Sun Mar 28 17:09:33 2010
>
> rb_tree cache is added to struct ext4_group_info at minor cost.
Please include a reason for the change in the commit message,
so that in the future people don't have to figure out for
themselves why a change was made. It also helps reviewers. :)
...
> @@ -4376,7 +4384,7 @@ ext4_mb_free_metadata(handle_t *handle,
> if (block < entry->start_blk)
> n = &(*n)->rb_left;
> else if (block >= (entry->start_blk + entry->count))
> - n = &(*n)->rb_right;
> + n = &(*n)->rb_right, left = 0;
> else {
> ext4_grp_locked_error(sb, e4b->bd_group, __func__,
> "Double free of blocks %d (%d %d)",
I think it's better if you don't use that style, but instead:
else if (block >= (entry->start_blk + entry->count)) {
n = &(*n)->rb_right;
left = 0;
} else {
...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists