[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100404021101.GD18524@thunk.org>
Date: Sat, 3 Apr 2010 22:11:01 -0400
From: tytso@....edu
To: Andreas Dilger <andreas.dilger@...cle.com>
Cc: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>,
ext4 development <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>,
Alessandro Polverini <alex@...bles.it>,
Christoph Biedl <bugzilla.kernel.bpeb@...chmal.in-ulm.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] resize: check s_log_groups_per_flex before accessing
flex groups
On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 09:14:07AM -0600, Andreas Dilger wrote:
> On 2010-03-27, at 13:32, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> >#13549, Kernel oops while online resizing of an ext4 filesystem
> >
> >if groups_per_flex < 2, sbi->s_flex_groups[] doesn't get filled out,
> >and every other access to this first tests s_log_groups_per_flex;
> >same thing needs to happen in resize or we'll wander off into
> >a null pointer.
>
> Does it even make sense to set INCOMPAT_FLEX_BG if we only have a
> single group per flexbg? That is just a normal filesystem then.
> That would be a separate bug in mke2fs.
Yes, it does make sense to set flex_bg in this case; it allows the
group metadata to be stored outside of a blockgroup, which is helpful
to e2fsck in some cases when it needs to relocate an inode table and
there's no contiguous free space available in the block group.
- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists