[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4BBE059D.3080208@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 08 Apr 2010 11:34:37 -0500
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>
To: Nebojsa Trpkovic <trx.lists@...il.com>
CC: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: "data=writeback" and TRIM don't get along
Nebojsa Trpkovic wrote:
> On 04/08/10 17:32, Eric Sandeen wrote:
>> Well, you might just keep in mind that:
>>
>> 1) trimming these small amounts has actually looked very inefficient, and
>> 2) data=writeback really isn't very safe in the face of a crash or power loss, and
>> 3) hopefully we'll have a better trim solution eventually.
>
> 1) I understand that big TRIMs are better then small ones, but skipping
> some TRIMs completely would lead to slow but sure drive degradation as
> drive would have less and less spare space for wear leveling.
>
> 2) Yes, I'm aware of possible data=writeback inconsistency, but I've
> tried to let IO scheduler to merge and reorganize as many writes as it
> can, all to avoid small writes to SSD which are main cause of write
> amplification.
>
> 3) I'll stick with no data=writeback for the time being. I guess I'm
> doing just fine even without it. :)
>
>
> One more noob quotestion completely out-of-topic:
> Will md layer pass TRIM command to drive if one has ext4 on linux
> software RAID 0/1/5 ?
I think the answer is "not yet but it's being worked on"
-Eric
> Nebojsa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists