[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4BC5E766.3030801@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 11:03:50 -0500
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>
To: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
CC: Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@...nvz.org>,
ext4 development <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: ext34_free_inode's mess
Jan Kara wrote:
> On Wed 14-04-10 15:19:47, Dmitry Monakhov wrote:
>> I've finally automated my favorite testcase (see attachment),
>> before i've run it by hand.
>> And sometimes i've saw following complain from fsck:
>> fsck.ext4 -f -n /dev/sdb2
>> ...
>> Pass 5: Checking group summary information
>> Inode bitmap differences: -93582
>> Fix? no
>>
>> Free inodes count wrong for group #12 (4634, counted=4633).
>> Fix? no
>>
>> Free inodes count wrong (35610, counted=35609).
>> Fix? no
>> ...
> Interesting. So some inode is marked as free although it is in
> use, right? That sounds like a nasty bug - if you reproduce this
> again, could you use debugfs to find out what file type is that
> inode? It could help looking for the bug.
running fsstress in verbose mode, and disabling link/unlink/symlink,
you can sometimes narrow it down to a sequence of operations on that file, too.
(keep track of the seed nr...)
Of course if it's a random-ish race that probably won't be of much use. :)
-Eric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists