[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100414080019.GQ10776@bolzano.suse.de>
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 10:00:19 +0200
From: Jan Blunck <jblunck@...e.de>
To: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinderlinux@...il.com>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, tytso@....edu,
Linux-Kernel Mailinglist <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@...l.parknet.co.jp>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] ext2: Add ext2_sb_info s_lock spinlock
On Wed, Apr 14, Jaswinder Singh Rajput wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 2:11 AM, Jan Blunck <jblunck@...e.de> wrote:
> > Add a spinlock that protects against concurrent modifications of
> > s_mount_state, s_blocks_last, s_overhead_last and the content of the
> > superblock's buffer pointed to by sbi->s_es. This is a preparation patch
> > for removing the BKL from ext2 in the next patch.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jan Blunck <jblunck@...e.de>
> > Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
> > Cc: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
> > Cc: OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@...l.parknet.co.jp>
> > ---
> > fs/ext2/inode.c | 2 ++
> > fs/ext2/super.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> > include/linux/ext2_fs_sb.h | 6 ++++++
> > 3 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/ext2/inode.c b/fs/ext2/inode.c
> > index fc13cc1..5d15442 100644
> > --- a/fs/ext2/inode.c
> > +++ b/fs/ext2/inode.c
> > @@ -1407,9 +1407,11 @@ static int __ext2_write_inode(struct inode *inode, int do_sync)
> > * created, add a flag to the superblock.
> > */
> > lock_kernel();
> > + spin_lock(&EXT2_SB(sb)->s_lock);
> > ext2_update_dynamic_rev(sb);
> > EXT2_SET_RO_COMPAT_FEATURE(sb,
> > EXT2_FEATURE_RO_COMPAT_LARGE_FILE);
> > + spin_unlock(&EXT2_SB(sb)->s_lock);
> > unlock_kernel();
> > ext2_write_super(sb);
>
> Do we need both locks (kernel lock and spin lock)
>
The BKL is removed in a separate patch. First I though it should get merged
through Frederic's tree but since the removal does not depend on the pushdown
from do_new_mount() I guess it is safe to add here.
Thanks,
Jan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists