[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <x49fx2wemwt.fsf@segfault.boston.devel.redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 11:49:22 -0400
From: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@...hat.com>
To: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
Cc: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] block: Implement a blk_yield function to voluntarily give up the I/O scheduler.
Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com> writes:
> On Wed, Apr 14 2010, Vivek Goyal wrote:
>> > @@ -1887,6 +1891,9 @@ static void cfq_dispatch_insert(struct request_queue *q, struct request *rq)
>> >
>> > cfqd->rq_in_flight[cfq_cfqq_sync(cfqq)]++;
>> > cfqq->nr_sectors += blk_rq_sectors(rq);
>> > +
>> > + if (cfq_cfqq_yield(cfqq) && RB_EMPTY_ROOT(&cfqq->sort_list))
>> > + cfq_yield_cfqq(cfqd, cfqq);
>>
>> Jeff,
>>
>> I am wondering if cfq_select_queue() will be a better place for yielding
>> the queue.
>>
>> if (cfq_cfqq_yield(cfqq) && RB_EMPTY_ROOT(&cfqq->sort_list))
>> goto expire;
>>
>> We can avoid one unnecessary __blk_run_queue().
>
> Agree, doing it on insert is not the right place.
I see where you're coming from, but that makes things quite a bit
trickier. I look forward to the review of *that* patch. ;-)
Cheers,
Jeff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists