[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201004152231.o3FMVwAT001332@demeter.kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 22:31:58 GMT
From: bugzilla-daemon@...zilla.kernel.org
To: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [Bug 15792] ext4_inode_inode->i_flags modification is racy
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15792
--- Comment #2 from Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@...nvz.org> 2010-04-15 22:31:55 ---
The oops happens because non tested branch was triggered.
./fs/ext4/extents.c
3477: if (unlikely(EXT4_I(inode)->i_flags & EXT4_EOFBLOCKS_FL)) {
if (unlikely(!eh->eh_entries)) {
EXT4_ERROR_INODE(inode,
"eh->eh_entries == 0 ee_block %d",
ex->ee_block);
### OOPS here because ex == NULL ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
err = -EIO;
goto out2;
}
Bug was introduced by following commit:
commit 273df556b6ee2065bfe96edab5888d3dc9b108d8
Author: Frank Mayhar <fmayhar@...gle.com>
Date: Tue Mar 2 11:46:09 2010 -0500
And in fact it is rather trivial to fix.
But most interesting question what the hell we are doing on that error path?
inode has EXT4_EOFBLOCKS_FL flag enabled but eh->eh_entries, and in fact
after adding more debug information i've found that inode is simply blockless.
i_blocks == 0, i_size == 0.
I've collected per-inode i_flag modification history (see an attachment)
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists