[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2010 19:07:07 +0200
From: Andre Noll <maan@...temlinux.org>
To: Andrew Vasquez <andrew.vasquez@...gic.com>
Cc: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>,
"linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org" <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Driver <Linux-Driver@...gic.com>,
Thomas Helle <Helle@...bingen.mpg.de>
Subject: Re: ext4: (2.6.34-rc4): This should not happen!! Data will be lost
On 09:36, Andrew Vasquez wrote:
> > > qla2xxx 0000:06:09.0: scsi(0:0:0): Abort command issued -- 1 fa6a73 2002.
> > >
> > > I can't explain why the storage did not complete the request in the
> > > allotted time.
> >
> > Ah, that's valuable information, thanks. The underlying Infortrend
> > Raid System is rather old but worked without any problems for several
> > years. We recently replaced its 400G disks by new 2T WD disks. Maybe
> > the new disks have longer response times, could that be the reason? And
> > is there a way to increase the timeout value?
>
> To update the default timeout value (30 seconds) for commands
> submitted to /dev/sdn to 60 seconds:
>
> $ echo 60 > /sys/block/sdn/device/timeout
I will re-run the stress test with a 60 seconds timeout value and follow
up if this did not help.
Thanks again
Andre
--
The only person who always got his work done by Friday was Robinson Crusoe
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (190 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists