[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <E1O3sLi-0008EA-QW@pomaz-ex.szeredi.hu>
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 16:53:22 +0200
From: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
To: Valerie Aurora <vaurora@...hat.com>
CC: jblunck@...e.de, jamie@...reable.org, dwmw2@...radead.org,
viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, tytso@....edu,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/35] fallthru: ext2 fallthru support
On Mon, 19 Apr 2010, Valerie Aurora wrote:
> I don't recall there being any technical reason not to look up the
> real inode number. I just wrote it that we because I was lazy. So I
> like returning the directory's d_ino better than a single magic
> number, but I'd at least like to try returning the real inode number
> too.
Note, "struct dirent" doesn't have d_dev, so you really can't return
the "real" inode number, that's on a different filesystem and just a
random number in the context of the the readdir in question.
Thanks,
Miklos
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists