[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100419223938.GJ5439@quack.suse.cz>
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2010 00:39:38 +0200
From: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
To: Greg Freemyer <greg.freemyer@...il.com>
Cc: Kazuya Mio <k-mio@...jp.nec.com>,
ext4 <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>, Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
OHSM-DEV <ohsm-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@...nvz.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/3] ext4: inode preferred block allocation
On Thu 15-04-10 12:22:38, Greg Freemyer wrote:
<snip>
> fyi: Creating locality groups is the use case I see for Dmitry's
> Project ID patchset. A collection of files that are used together can
> be assigned a unique ProjectID and then e4defrag can grow the
> knowledge to place them within a locality area on the disk.
>
> But I also can see that new files within a directory would inherit the
> ProjectID from the directory, and the data blocks allocated from the
> correct locality area from the get go.
>
> Dmitry, I haven't studied your patchset, but does it allow for
> ProjectID inheritance from the parent directory?
Yes, ProjectID should be inherited from the parent directory.
Honza
--
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
SUSE Labs, CR
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists