[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1271682168.14748.718.camel@macbook.infradead.org>
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 14:02:48 +0100
From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
To: Jan Blunck <jblunck@...e.de>
Cc: Valerie Aurora <vaurora@...hat.com>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/35] fallthru: ext2 fallthru support
On Mon, 2010-04-19 at 14:40 +0200, Jan Blunck wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 15, Valerie Aurora wrote:
>
> > Add support for fallthru directory entries to ext2.
> >
> > XXX - Makes up inode number for fallthru entry
> > XXX - Might be better implemented as special symlinks
>
> Better not. David Woodhouse actually convinced me of moving away from the
> special symlink approach. The whiteouts have been implemented as special
> symlinks before.
I certainly asked whether you really need a real 'struct inode' for
whiteouts, and suggested that they should be represented _purely_ as a
dentry with type DT_WHT.
I don't much like the manifestation of that in this patch though,
especially with the made-up inode number. (ISTR I had other
jffs2-specific objections too, which I'll dig out and forward).
--
David Woodhouse Open Source Technology Centre
David.Woodhouse@...el.com Intel Corporation
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists