[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100420183533.GA21495@skl-net.de>
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2010 20:35:33 +0200
From: Andre Noll <maan@...temlinux.org>
To: Bernd Schubert <bernd.schubert@...tmail.fm>
Cc: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>,
Andrew Vasquez <andrew.vasquez@...gic.com>,
"linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org" <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Driver <Linux-Driver@...gic.com>,
Thomas Helle <Helle@...bingen.mpg.de>
Subject: Re: ext4: (2.6.34-rc4): This should not happen!! Data will be lost
On 19:26, Bernd Schubert wrote:
> On Tuesday 20 April 2010, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> I think interesting at this point would be the exact model of the Infortrend
> device.
Here's the system information as reported by the telnet interface:
CPU Type PPC750FX
Total Cache Size 2048MB DDR(ECC)
Firmware Version 3.42I.03
Bootrecord Version 1.23A
FW Upgradability Rev. C
Serial Number 6912121
Battery Backup Unit Present
Base Board Rev. ID 0
Base Board ID 81
ID of NVRAM Defaults A16F-G2221 V6.10
Controller Position Slot A
> There are some completely broken models (IMHO), which have two
> controllers for redundancy.
This is a 4 year old system (which does not support Raid6). It has only
a single controller though.
> Now with enabled write-back cache, it can happen that those units run
> into some kind of firmware bug. It then takes about 2h to flush 2GB of
> write-back cache. The telnet interface will show the status of the
> cache.
Hey, I saw this once on a different (newer) infortrend system. However,
it might still be hapening on this system as well and cause the timeout
problems.
Guess I'll have to check if there's a more recent firmware for this
system..
Thanks
Andre
--
The only person who always got his work done by Friday was Robinson Crusoe
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (190 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists