[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <bug-15875-13602@https.bugzilla.kernel.org/>
Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2010 09:29:12 GMT
From: bugzilla-daemon@...zilla.kernel.org
To: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [Bug 15875] New: Add options to disable POSIX acl for ext2/ext3/ext4
file systems
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15875
Summary: Add options to disable POSIX acl for ext2/ext3/ext4
file systems
Product: File System
Version: 2.5
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Tree: Mainline
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P1
Component: ext2
AssignedTo: fs_ext2@...nel-bugs.osdl.org
ReportedBy: t.artem@...lcity.com
Regression: No
VFAT becomes less of an option for many hardware producers and many of them
will be glad to embrace ext2/ext3/ext4 filesystems but they have an inherent
problem, they enforce POSIX ACLs.
So, imagine a situation when Peter who has UID=63555 (he's in a corporate
network and that's his real UID according to LDAP) formats his flash drive
using ext2/ext3/ext4 filesystem, then uses sudo to recursively chown the whole
filesystem for his own possession.
Now, Peter comes to a less savvy Alice who wasn't given root permissions on her
PC and she tries to open Peter's flash stick. Oops, Alice cannot open or read
any file on it. I can come up with ten other different scenarios when ACLs are
superfluous.
Taking this situation into consideration it becomes clear that ACL's for
removable storage is more a hassle than a security feature.
So, I strongly suggest implementing a flag which tells the kernel to disregard
all file/directory permissions on the aforementioned FS's.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists