[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201005042105.o44L5P7K016070@demeter.kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 4 May 2010 21:05:25 GMT
From: bugzilla-daemon@...zilla.kernel.org
To: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [Bug 15906] serious performance regression in "umount" on ext4 over
LVM
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15906
Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |sandeen@...hat.com
--- Comment #4 from Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com> 2010-05-04 21:05:24 ---
As I mentioned on the RH bz, it seems barrier-related.
I thought most barrier enhancements/changes were before 2.6.31, though. Was
this really fast for you on .31? Lots of lvm barrier changes went into .30.
mounting either the host fs, the loopback file, or both with "nobarrier" avoids
all the cache flushes from the barriers, and it's speedy again.
-Eric
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists