linux-ext4 - Re: ext4 df regression introduced by commit 9d0be50

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 20 May 2010 19:32:45 -0400
From:	tytso@....edu
To:	linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: ext4 df regression introduced by commit 9d0be50

On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 02:59:11PM -0600, Bruce Guenter wrote:
> On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 10:32:14AM -0600, Bruce Guenter wrote:
> > IIRC this only affects NFS clients.  The same test running locally on
> > the server doesn't show the same problem.  I will retest shortly and
> > confirm (and also test with 2.6.34).
> 
> Sorry, I was mistaken.  Running 'df' either locally or remotely shows
> the same results.
> 
> I have been unable to reproduce the problem with a simplified test
> program as of yet, and have so far been unable to reproduce the problem
> with 2.6.34 with any program either.
> 
> Hopefully this means the problem has been solved, but I'll let you know
> if it reappears in 2.6.34

Sorry for not responding right away; I've been a bit swamped lately
and this fell through the cracks in my inbox.

Yes this is fixed in 2.6.34.  The fix for your problem was commit
d330a5be.  If I have a moment to breathe I'll try to get that
backported to the 2.6.33 stable series, but upgrading to 2.6.34 works
too.  :-)

					- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html