linux-ext4 - Re: [PATCH 2/2] ext4: Clear the EXT4_EOFBLOCKS

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87bpc4ktkq.fsf@openvz.org>
Date:	Tue, 25 May 2010 17:19:01 +0400
From:	Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@...nvz.org>
To:	tytso@....edu
Cc:	Ext4 Developers List <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ext4: Clear the EXT4_EOFBLOCKS_FL flag only when warranted

tytso@....edu writes:

> On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 05:12:36PM +0400, Dmitry Monakhov wrote:
>> Yes but changes was requested, so i've prepared new version.
>> I'll post it against Jan's xfsqa quota branch.
>
> Is there a reason you don't just base it against the xfstests mainline
> and send the patch directly to xfs@....sgi.com?  Your patch isn't
> related to quota or has any dependency on other changes that might be
> in Jan's branch, right?  Or am I missing something?
They are related because test number always increasing, and i want to
use the test to run with and w/o quota enabled.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html