[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100525140239.GH5556@thunk.org>
Date: Tue, 25 May 2010 10:02:39 -0400
From: tytso@....edu
To: Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@...nvz.org>
Cc: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: ext4: Do not dec quota for reserved blocks on error paths v2
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 08:53:01PM +0400, Dmitry Monakhov wrote:
> If we have failed some where inside ext4_get_blocks() internals we may
> have allocated some new blocks, which was not yet claimed to quota.
> We have to free such blocks, but without touching quota. Quota will
> be updated later on exit from ext4_get_blocks().
> There are two possible ways to understand what we have to skip quota update:
> 1) Caller pass corresponding flag to ext4_free_blocks()
> 2) check that free_blocks() was indirectly called by get_blocks()
> (i.e EXT4_I(inode)->i_delalloc_reserved_flag is set)
> Second is simpler, but may result in unpredictable consequences later.
> So i've chosen the first one, because caller must know which blocks it
> is freeing.
>
> Eric, please take your attention to metadata blocks handling when
> you will work on new versing of "ext4: don't use quota reservation for
> speculative metadata blocks" patch.
This patch needs to be carefully changed after Eric's patch has gone
in (which I've already applied into the patch queue). As a result I'm
going to hold off applying your patch until either (a) someone
(probably you or I) has a chance to fix it up in light of Eric's
changes.
I'm not sure I'll get to it before I need to push patches to Linus,
though, so it might miss the merge window. If we can make this a
simple and easy to vet bugfix, I might be able to push it through as a
supplementary bug fix push.
- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists