[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100525164526.GA8999@suse.de>
Date: Tue, 25 May 2010 09:45:26 -0700
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
To: Grant Coady <gcoady.lk@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...nel.org,
stable-review@...nel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk,
Ext4 Developers List <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>,
Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>,
"Jayson R. King" <dev@...sonking.com>,
"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [04/24] ext4: Make sure all the block allocation paths reserve
blocks
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 05:21:43PM +1000, Grant Coady wrote:
> On Mon, 24 May 2010 15:28:00 -0700, you wrote:
>
> >2.6.27-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
> >
> >------------------
> >
> >
> >From: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> >
> >commit a30d542a0035b886ffaafd0057ced0a2b28c3a4f upstream.
> >
> >With delayed allocation we need to make sure block are reserved before
> >we attempt to allocate them. Otherwise we get block allocation failure
> >(ENOSPC) during writepages which cannot be handled. This would mean
> >silent data loss (We do a printk stating data will be lost). This patch
> >updates the DIO and fallocate code path to do block reservation before
> >block allocation. This is needed to make sure parallel DIO and fallocate
> >request doesn't take block out of delayed reserve space.
> >
> >When free blocks count go below a threshold we switch to a slow patch
>
> s/patch/path/ ??
>
> Or, are these patch comments locked in stone for -stable?
Yes, I like to keep the changelog identical to what is in Linus's tree
as well.
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists