[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <BE781EC4-8A82-478F-8D10-BC19C0664567@oracle.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2010 18:35:16 -0600
From: Andreas Dilger <andreas.dilger@...cle.com>
To: Valerie Aurora <vaurora@...hat.com>
Cc: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>,
"linux-ext4@...r.kernel.orgdevelopment" <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: problems with large group descriptors and 64bit
On 2010-06-24, at 11:41 AM, Valerie Aurora <vaurora@...hat.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 05:24:34PM -0600, Andreas Dilger wrote:
>
>> lib/ext2fs/blknum.c assumes 64BIT means ext4_group_desc, not s_desc_size:
>> struct ext2_group_desc *ext2fs_group_desc(ext2_filsys fs,
>> struct opaque_ext2_group_desc *gdp,
>> dgrp_t group)
>> {
>> if (fs->super->s_desc_size >= EXT2_MIN_DESC_SIZE_64BIT)
>> return (struct ext2_group_desc *)
>> ((struct ext4_group_desc *) gdp + group);
>> else
>> return (struct ext2_group_desc *) gdp + group;
>> }
>
> I'm not sure I understand. Are there more than two possible sizes for
> group descriptors? Or is the existing code correct but you'd like to
> use s_desc_size directly for simplicity?
When the 64BIT flag is set the size kid the group descriptor is given by s_group_desc, which is currently the same as struct ext4_group_desc, but it might be larger in the future. --
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists