| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <12775087412359@site>
Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2010 16:32:21 -0700
From: <gregkh@...e.de>
To: tytso@....edu, aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
david@...morbit.com, dev@...sonking.com, gregkh@...e.de,
Kay.Diederichs@...-konstanz.de, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Cc: <stable@...nel.org>, <stable-commits@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "ext4: Use our own write_cache_pages()" has been added to the 2.6.27-stable tree
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
ext4: Use our own write_cache_pages()
to the 2.6.27-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
ext4-use-our-own-write_cache_pages.patch
and it can be found in the queue-2.6.27 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@...nel.org> know about it.
>From dev@...sonking.com Fri Jun 25 15:32:26 2010
From: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
Date: Fri, 28 May 2010 14:26:25 -0500
Subject: ext4: Use our own write_cache_pages()
Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>, Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>, "Jayson R. King" <dev@...sonking.com>, Kay Diederichs <Kay.Diederichs@...-konstanz.de>, Ext4 Developers List <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>, "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Message-ID: <4C0018E1.5060007@...sonking.com>
From: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
commit 8e48dcfbd7c0892b4cfd064d682cc4c95a29df32 upstream.
Make a copy of write_cache_pages() for the benefit of
ext4_da_writepages(). This allows us to simplify the code some, and
will allow us to further customize the code in future patches.
There are some nasty hacks in write_cache_pages(), which Linus has
(correctly) characterized as vile. I've just copied it into
write_cache_pages_da(), without trying to clean those bits up lest I
break something in the ext4's delalloc implementation, which is a bit
fragile right now. This will allow Dave Chinner to clean up
write_cache_pages() in mm/page-writeback.c, without worrying about
breaking ext4. Eventually write_cache_pages_da() will go away when I
rewrite ext4's delayed allocation and create a general
ext4_writepages() which is used for all of ext4's writeback. Until
now this is the lowest risk way to clean up the core
write_cache_pages() function.
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>
Cc: Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>
[dev@...sonking.com: Dropped the hunks which reverted the use of no_nrwrite_index_update, since those lines weren't ever created on 2.6.27.y]
[dev@...sonking.com: Copied from 2.6.27.y's version of write_cache_pages(), plus the changes to it from patch "vfs: Add no_nrwrite_index_update writeback control flag"]
Signed-off-by: Jayson R. King <dev@...sonking.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>
---
fs/ext4/inode.c | 144 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
1 file changed, 132 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
--- a/fs/ext4/inode.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/inode.c
@@ -2059,17 +2059,6 @@ static int __mpage_da_writepage(struct p
struct buffer_head *bh, *head, fake;
sector_t logical;
- if (mpd->io_done) {
- /*
- * Rest of the page in the page_vec
- * redirty then and skip then. We will
- * try to to write them again after
- * starting a new transaction
- */
- redirty_page_for_writepage(wbc, page);
- unlock_page(page);
- return MPAGE_DA_EXTENT_TAIL;
- }
/*
* Can we merge this page to current extent?
*/
@@ -2160,6 +2149,137 @@ static int __mpage_da_writepage(struct p
}
/*
+ * write_cache_pages_da - walk the list of dirty pages of the given
+ * address space and call the callback function (which usually writes
+ * the pages).
+ *
+ * This is a forked version of write_cache_pages(). Differences:
+ * Range cyclic is ignored.
+ * no_nrwrite_index_update is always presumed true
+ */
+static int write_cache_pages_da(struct address_space *mapping,
+ struct writeback_control *wbc,
+ struct mpage_da_data *mpd)
+{
+ struct backing_dev_info *bdi = mapping->backing_dev_info;
+ int ret = 0;
+ int done = 0;
+ struct pagevec pvec;
+ int nr_pages;
+ pgoff_t index;
+ pgoff_t end; /* Inclusive */
+ long nr_to_write = wbc->nr_to_write;
+
+ if (wbc->nonblocking && bdi_write_congested(bdi)) {
+ wbc->encountered_congestion = 1;
+ return 0;
+ }
+
+ pagevec_init(&pvec, 0);
+ index = wbc->range_start >> PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT;
+ end = wbc->range_end >> PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT;
+
+ while (!done && (index <= end)) {
+ int i;
+
+ nr_pages = pagevec_lookup_tag(&pvec, mapping, &index,
+ PAGECACHE_TAG_DIRTY,
+ min(end - index, (pgoff_t)PAGEVEC_SIZE-1) + 1);
+ if (nr_pages == 0)
+ break;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < nr_pages; i++) {
+ struct page *page = pvec.pages[i];
+
+ /*
+ * At this point, the page may be truncated or
+ * invalidated (changing page->mapping to NULL), or
+ * even swizzled back from swapper_space to tmpfs file
+ * mapping. However, page->index will not change
+ * because we have a reference on the page.
+ */
+ if (page->index > end) {
+ done = 1;
+ break;
+ }
+
+ lock_page(page);
+
+ /*
+ * Page truncated or invalidated. We can freely skip it
+ * then, even for data integrity operations: the page
+ * has disappeared concurrently, so there could be no
+ * real expectation of this data interity operation
+ * even if there is now a new, dirty page at the same
+ * pagecache address.
+ */
+ if (unlikely(page->mapping != mapping)) {
+continue_unlock:
+ unlock_page(page);
+ continue;
+ }
+
+ if (!PageDirty(page)) {
+ /* someone wrote it for us */
+ goto continue_unlock;
+ }
+
+ if (PageWriteback(page)) {
+ if (wbc->sync_mode != WB_SYNC_NONE)
+ wait_on_page_writeback(page);
+ else
+ goto continue_unlock;
+ }
+
+ BUG_ON(PageWriteback(page));
+ if (!clear_page_dirty_for_io(page))
+ goto continue_unlock;
+
+ ret = __mpage_da_writepage(page, wbc, mpd);
+
+ if (unlikely(ret)) {
+ if (ret == AOP_WRITEPAGE_ACTIVATE) {
+ unlock_page(page);
+ ret = 0;
+ } else {
+ done = 1;
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+
+ if (nr_to_write > 0) {
+ nr_to_write--;
+ if (nr_to_write == 0 &&
+ wbc->sync_mode == WB_SYNC_NONE) {
+ /*
+ * We stop writing back only if we are
+ * not doing integrity sync. In case of
+ * integrity sync we have to keep going
+ * because someone may be concurrently
+ * dirtying pages, and we might have
+ * synced a lot of newly appeared dirty
+ * pages, but have not synced all of the
+ * old dirty pages.
+ */
+ done = 1;
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+
+ if (wbc->nonblocking && bdi_write_congested(bdi)) {
+ wbc->encountered_congestion = 1;
+ done = 1;
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+ pagevec_release(&pvec);
+ cond_resched();
+ }
+ return ret;
+}
+
+
+/*
* mpage_da_writepages - walk the list of dirty pages of the given
* address space, allocates non-allocated blocks, maps newly-allocated
* blocks to existing bhs and issue IO them
@@ -2192,7 +2312,7 @@ static int mpage_da_writepages(struct ad
to_write = wbc->nr_to_write;
- ret = write_cache_pages(mapping, wbc, __mpage_da_writepage, mpd);
+ ret = write_cache_pages_da(mapping, wbc, mpd);
/*
* Handle last extent of pages
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from tytso@....edu are
queue-2.6.27/ext4-fix-file-fragmentation-during-large-file-write.patch
queue-2.6.27/ext4-use-our-own-write_cache_pages.patch
queue-2.6.27/ext4-implement-range_cyclic-in-ext4_da_writepages-instead-of-write_cache_pages.patch
queue-2.6.27/ext4-check-s_log_groups_per_flex-in-online-resize-code.patch
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists