linux-ext4 - Re: Ext4 on SSD Intel X25-M

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 27 Jun 2010 19:47:46 +0200
From:	Nebojsa Trpkovic <trx.lists@...il.com>
To:	linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Ext4 on SSD Intel X25-M

Hello.

I've found this old thread

http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.file-systems.ext4/16386/focus=16444

and wanted to contribute a piece of my exiriance.

As I don't know if putting right subject will be enough to make reply on
right thread, I'm putting to BCC addresses of all coresponders in old
thread.

I've noticed that there is a difference between
/sys/fs/ext4/sdXX/lifetime_write_kbytes
and host writes read from SSD itself.

I'll put aside issue of losing lifetime_write_kbytes accuracy after
unclean reboot/shutdown:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.file-systems.ext4/19734

Guess that session_write_kbytes doesn't succed to be added to
lifetime_write_kbytes in that particular case.

In normal desktop operation "host writes" counter on SSD increases at
roughly ~2/3 compared to lifetime_write_kbytes.

My best guess is that host itself uses a lot of optimisation to reduce
writing to NAND itself.

Besides that, I've noticed that my commit=100 mount option helps also.
Changing (just for testing) to something realy big, like commit=9000,
gave even further improvement, but not worth staying with risk of losing
(that much) data. It seems that ext4 writes a lot to filesystem, but
many of those writes are overwrites. If we flush them to host just once
in 100 seconds, we're getting a lot of saving.

As I wanted to make even my swap TRIMable, I've put it in the file on
ext4 instead of separate partition. I've made it using dd with seek=500
bs=1M options. ext4's lifetime_write_kbytes increased by 500MB, and host
writes did not incrase at all, even after 100 seconds. Ok, I know that
ext4 did not write 500MB of data to filesystem, but this is one more
thing why one should not trust lifetime_write_kbytes.

So, the moral of my story would be not to trust lifetime_write_kbytes,
but to read host writes from SSD.

I noticed that Intel's Solid State Drive Toolbox software (running in
Windows) gives the amount of Host Lifetime Writes that equales to
S.M.A.R.T attribute 225 (Load_Cycle_Count) multiplied with 32MB.
That's the way I track it in Linux.

Nebojsa Trpkovic

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html