[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1007121802590.13784@localhost>
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2010 18:05:58 +0200 (CEST)
From: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@...hat.com>
To: Ric Wheeler <rwheeler@...hat.com>
cc: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Lukas Czerner <lczerner@...hat.com>,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, jmoyer@...hat.com, eshishki@...hat.com,
sandeen@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Add discard/nodiscard mount option for ext3
On Mon, 12 Jul 2010, Ric Wheeler wrote:
> On 07/12/2010 11:19 AM, Jan Kara wrote:
> > > Those mount option has the same meaning as in ext4 file system. It
> > > provide a way to enable/disable file system's trim support. The trim
> > > support is off by default, thus nodiscard option is not actually
> > > necessary.
> > I kind of miss why ext3 should have a 'discard' mount option. When
> > user calls DISCARD ioctl on the filesystem, then he probably wants
> > discard to be performed.
> >
> > Honza
> >
>
> Sorry I misunderstood your original question.
>
> One reason that you might want to have a "discard" option is to allow a system
> admin to mount without barriers to protect flaky hardware (we have had some
> mixed results for example). As you say, the user probably wants to have the
> ioctl do the discard and should be reasonable for doing it only on solid
> devices,
The question is what in does on device other than SSD. I know it does
not harm the deivce, but is there some kernel logic preventing the trim
command to be send to device that does not support it ? I hope so.
-Lukas
>
> Regards,
>
> Ric
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists