| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <4C3E1922.4010001@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2010 15:08:02 -0500
From: Brian King <brking@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Josef Bacik <josef@...hat.com>
CC: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, cmm@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
pmac@....ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 1/1] jbd2: Fix I/O hang in jbd2_journal_release_jbd_inode
On 07/14/2010 02:05 PM, Josef Bacik wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 01:58:46PM -0500, Brian King wrote:
>>
>> I've been debugging a hang in jbd2_journal_release_jbd_inode
>> which is being seen on Power 6 systems quite a lot. When we get
>> in the hung state, all I/O to the disk in question gets blocked
>> where we stay indefinitely. Looking at the task list, I can see
>> we are stuck in jbd2_journal_release_jbd_inode waiting on a
>> wake up. I added some debug code to detect this scenario and
>> dump additional data if we were stuck in jbd2_journal_release_jbd_inode
>> for longer than 30 minutes. When it hit, I was able to see that
>> i_flags was 0, suggesting we missed the wake up.
>>
>> This patch changes i_flags to be an unsigned long, uses bit operators
>> to access it, and adds barriers around the accesses. Prior to applying
>> this patch, we were regularly hitting this hang on numerous systems
>> in our test environment. After applying the patch, the hangs no longer
>> occur. Its still not clear to me why the j_list_lock doesn't protect us
>> in this path. It also appears a hang very similar to this was seen
>> in the past and then was no longer recreatable:
>>
>> http://forum.soft32.com/linux/20090310-ext4-hangs-ftopict478916.html
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Brian King <brking@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
>> ---
>>
>> fs/jbd2/commit.c | 12 ++++++++----
>> fs/jbd2/journal.c | 5 ++++-
>> include/linux/jbd2.h | 2 +-
>> 3 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff -puN include/linux/jbd2.h~jbd2_ji_commit_barrier_patch include/linux/jbd2.h
>> --- linux-2.6/include/linux/jbd2.h~jbd2_ji_commit_barrier_patch 2010-07-14 13:46:17.000000000 -0500
>> +++ linux-2.6-bjking1/include/linux/jbd2.h 2010-07-14 13:46:17.000000000 -0500
>> @@ -395,7 +395,7 @@ struct jbd2_inode {
>> struct inode *i_vfs_inode;
>>
>> /* Flags of inode [j_list_lock] */
>> - unsigned int i_flags;
>> + unsigned long i_flags;
>> };
>>
>> struct jbd2_revoke_table_s;
>> diff -puN fs/jbd2/commit.c~jbd2_ji_commit_barrier_patch fs/jbd2/commit.c
>> --- linux-2.6/fs/jbd2/commit.c~jbd2_ji_commit_barrier_patch 2010-07-14 13:46:17.000000000 -0500
>> +++ linux-2.6-bjking1/fs/jbd2/commit.c 2010-07-14 13:56:27.000000000 -0500
>> @@ -26,7 +26,9 @@
>> #include <linux/backing-dev.h>
>> #include <linux/bio.h>
>> #include <linux/blkdev.h>
>> +#include <linux/bitops.h>
>> #include <trace/events/jbd2.h>
>> +#include <asm/system.h>
>>
>> /*
>> * Default IO end handler for temporary BJ_IO buffer_heads.
>> @@ -245,7 +247,7 @@ static int journal_submit_data_buffers(j
>> spin_lock(&journal->j_list_lock);
>> list_for_each_entry(jinode, &commit_transaction->t_inode_list, i_list) {
>> mapping = jinode->i_vfs_inode->i_mapping;
>> - jinode->i_flags |= JI_COMMIT_RUNNING;
>> + set_bit(__JI_COMMIT_RUNNING, &jinode->i_flags);
>> spin_unlock(&journal->j_list_lock);
>> /*
>> * submit the inode data buffers. We use writepage
>> @@ -260,7 +262,8 @@ static int journal_submit_data_buffers(j
>> spin_lock(&journal->j_list_lock);
>> J_ASSERT(jinode->i_transaction == commit_transaction);
>> commit_transaction->t_flushed_data_blocks = 1;
>> - jinode->i_flags &= ~JI_COMMIT_RUNNING;
>> + clear_bit(__JI_COMMIT_RUNNING, &jinode->i_flags);
>> + smp_mb__after_clear_bit();
>> wake_up_bit(&jinode->i_flags, __JI_COMMIT_RUNNING);
>> }
>> spin_unlock(&journal->j_list_lock);
>> @@ -281,7 +284,7 @@ static int journal_finish_inode_data_buf
>> /* For locking, see the comment in journal_submit_data_buffers() */
>> spin_lock(&journal->j_list_lock);
>> list_for_each_entry(jinode, &commit_transaction->t_inode_list, i_list) {
>> - jinode->i_flags |= JI_COMMIT_RUNNING;
>> + set_bit(__JI_COMMIT_RUNNING, &jinode->i_flags);
>> spin_unlock(&journal->j_list_lock);
>> err = filemap_fdatawait(jinode->i_vfs_inode->i_mapping);
>> if (err) {
>> @@ -297,7 +300,8 @@ static int journal_finish_inode_data_buf
>> ret = err;
>> }
>> spin_lock(&journal->j_list_lock);
>> - jinode->i_flags &= ~JI_COMMIT_RUNNING;
>> + clear_bit(__JI_COMMIT_RUNNING, &jinode->i_flags);
>> + smp_mb__after_clear_bit();
>> wake_up_bit(&jinode->i_flags, __JI_COMMIT_RUNNING);
>> }
>>
>> diff -puN fs/jbd2/journal.c~jbd2_ji_commit_barrier_patch fs/jbd2/journal.c
>> --- linux-2.6/fs/jbd2/journal.c~jbd2_ji_commit_barrier_patch 2010-07-14 13:46:17.000000000 -0500
>> +++ linux-2.6-bjking1/fs/jbd2/journal.c 2010-07-14 13:46:17.000000000 -0500
>> @@ -41,12 +41,14 @@
>> #include <linux/hash.h>
>> #include <linux/log2.h>
>> #include <linux/vmalloc.h>
>> +#include <linux/bitops.h>
>>
>> #define CREATE_TRACE_POINTS
>> #include <trace/events/jbd2.h>
>>
>> #include <asm/uaccess.h>
>> #include <asm/page.h>
>> +#include <asm/system.h>
>>
>> EXPORT_SYMBOL(jbd2_journal_start);
>> EXPORT_SYMBOL(jbd2_journal_restart);
>> @@ -2209,9 +2211,10 @@ void jbd2_journal_release_jbd_inode(jour
>> restart:
>> spin_lock(&journal->j_list_lock);
>> /* Is commit writing out inode - we have to wait */
>> - if (jinode->i_flags & JI_COMMIT_RUNNING) {
>> + if (test_bit(__JI_COMMIT_RUNNING, &jinode->i_flags)) {
>> wait_queue_head_t *wq;
>> DEFINE_WAIT_BIT(wait, &jinode->i_flags, __JI_COMMIT_RUNNING);
>> + smp_mb();
>> wq = bit_waitqueue(&jinode->i_flags, __JI_COMMIT_RUNNING);
>> prepare_to_wait(wq, &wait.wait, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
>> spin_unlock(&journal->j_list_lock);
>> _
>
> Seems reasonable to me, I assume you re-tested with this patch to make sure it
> still fixes the problem? You can add
I'm building a kernel with the updated patch and we will load it up on
the failing systems and retest. It usually takes a number of hours
before the problem hits on our test systems, so I may have some early
results tomorrow.
Thanks,
Brian
--
Brian King
Linux on Power Virtualization
IBM Linux Technology Center
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists