lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2010 12:11:53 +0200 From: Andreas Gruenbacher <agruen@...e.de> To: "Aneesh Kumar K. V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: sfrench@...ibm.com, ffilz@...ibm.com, adilger@....com, sandeen@...hat.com, tytso@....edu, staubach@...hat.com, bfields@...i.umich.edu, jlayton@...hat.com, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, nfsv4@...ux-nfs.org, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH -V2 00/16] New ACL format for better NFSv4 acl interoperability On Tuesday 20 July 2010 11:31:07 Aneesh Kumar K. V wrote: > We need to update ACL4_VALID_FLAGS to now consider ACL4_MASKED as a > valid flag. This is also needed for userspace. Good point, I missed that. > On a related note, should we move ACL4_MASKED and ACL4_POSIX_MAPPED to > be the higher bits ? That would make sure we will be able to accomodate > new flag value NFSv4 define. That makes sense, except that ACL4_POSIX_MAPPED hasn't entered the scene in the patches posted here, and I'm still not convinced that we'll actually need it. Thanks, Andreas -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists