[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LSU.2.01.1007221935190.32551@obet.zrqbmnf.qr>
Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2010 19:36:22 +0200 (CEST)
From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ozas.de>
To: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@....uio.no>
cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jeremy Allison <jra@...ba.org>, Volker.Lendecke@...net.de,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
linux-cifs@...r.kernel.org, linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org,
samba-technical@...ts.samba.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/18] xstat: Add a pair of system calls to make extended
file stats available [ver #6]
On Thursday 2010-07-22 19:16, Trond Myklebust wrote:
>> >But the fact is, th Unix ctime semantics are insane and largely
>> >useless. There's a damn good reason almost nobody uses ctime under
>> >unix.
>>
>> I beg to differ. ctime is not completely useless. It reflects changes on
>> the inode for when you don't you change the content. It's like an mtime
>> for the metadata. It comes useful when you go around in your filesystem
>> trying to figure out who of your co-admins screwed up the permissions on
>> /etc/passwd... and if the mtime is the same as that of the last backup,
>> I can at least have a reasonable assurance that it was /only/ the
>> metadata that was tampered with. (SHA1 check, yeah yeah, costly on large
>> files.)
>
>Errr... Only if you eliminate utimes() from your syscall table.
>Otherwise it is trivial to reset the mtime after changing the file
>contents.
Well yes; I had implicitly implied that evil people with malicious intent
are absent.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists