[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4C4B1574.4050608@redhat.com>
Date: Sat, 24 Jul 2010 12:31:48 -0400
From: Ric Wheeler <rwheeler@...hat.com>
To: "Ted Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>
CC: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@...hat.com>,
Lukas Czerner <lczerner@...hat.com>, eshishki@...hat.com,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, sandeen@...hat.com
Subject: Re: Ext4: batched discard support - simplified version
On 07/23/2010 11:19 AM, Ted Ts'o wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 11:13:52AM -0400, Jeff Moyer wrote:
>
>> I don't think so. In all of the configurations tested, I'm pretty sure
>> we saw a performance hit from doing the TRIMs right away. The queue
>> flush really hurts. Of course, I have no idea what you had in mind for
>> the amount of time in between batched discards.
>>
> Sure, but not all the world is SATA-attached SSD's. I'm thinking in
> particular of PCIe-attached SSD's, where the TRIM command might be
> very fast indeed... I believe Ric Wheeler tells me you have TMS
> RamSan SSD's in house that you are testing? And of course those
> aren't the only PCIe-attached flash devices out there....
>
> - Ted
>
I think that some of the PCI-e cards might want that information right
away, a lot of high end arrays actually prefer fewer larger chunks.
One other user might be virtual devices or some remote replication
mechanism. I wonder if the drbd people for example might (do?) use these?
ric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists