[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201007261753.o6QHr4Gr004228@demeter.kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2010 17:53:04 GMT
From: bugzilla-daemon@...zilla.kernel.org
To: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [Bug 16312] WARNING: at fs/fs-writeback.c:1127 __mark_inode_dirty
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16312
--- Comment #9 from Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@...inger.net> 2010-07-26 17:53:04 ---
These patches break my system (the one reported in Bug #16122). It obviously is
different.
After installing the patches. I get a NULL pointer dereference for address 0x30
as __mark_inode_dirty + 0xf0/0x1a0 (x86_64 system). The code offset 0xf30. I
have a 2.6.35-rc6 kernel.
The assembler code around that address is
/home/finger/linux-temp/fs/fs-writeback.c:960
f28: 4d 8b ac 24 b0 01 00 mov 0x1b0(%r12),%r13
f2f: 00
/home/finger/linux-temp/fs/fs-writeback.c:962
f30: 41 f6 45 30 02 testb $0x2,0x30(%r13)
f35: 75 31 jne f68 <__mark_inode_dirty+0x128>
f37: 41 f6 45 28 10 testb $0x10,0x28(%r13)
f3c: 75 2a jne f68 <__mark_inode_dirty+0x128>
The code at line 960 is:
struct backing_dev_info *bdi = wb->bdi;
if (bdi_cap_writeback_dirty(bdi) &&
!test_bit(BDI_registered, &bdi->state)) {
WARN_ON(1);
printk(KERN_ERR "bdi-%s not registered\n",
bdi->name);
}
and wb->bdi is NULL.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists