lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 3 Aug 2010 14:06:31 -0400
From:	Ted Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
To:	Bo Brantén <bosse@....umu.se>
Cc:	linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: persistent preallocation

On Tue, Aug 03, 2010 at 12:58:21PM +0200, Bo Brantén wrote:
> 
> I have a question on the implementation of persistent preallocation,
> the reason to not return the disk block is because it can contain
> old data but I wonder if an implementation has to return zeros
> instead or if it could return any garbage as long as it is not
> _that_ garbage?

What would be the point?  If we know that we can't return the on-disk
block contents, returning all zero's is much nicer for the application
since it also then looks like and works just like a sparse file.

      	      	   	      	  	- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ