[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <11B0076E-9611-459A-93D4-04DFA369FF52@dilger.ca>
Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2010 18:28:29 -0600
From: Andreas Dilger <adilger@...ger.ca>
To: Valerie Aurora <vaurora@...hat.com>
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>,
Jan Blunck <jblunck@...e.de>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 14/38] fallthru: ext2 fallthru support
On 2010-08-06, at 16:35, Valerie Aurora wrote:
> XXX What to do for d_ino for fallthrus? If we return the inode from
> the the underlying file system, it comes from a different inode
> "namespace" and that will produce spurious matches. This argues for
> implementation of fallthrus as symlinks because they have to allocate
> an inode (and inode number) anyway, and we can later reuse it if we
> copy the file up.
>
> @@ -342,6 +344,24 @@ ext2_readdir (struct file * filp, void * dirent, + /* XXX We don't know the inode number
> + * of the directory entry in the
> + * underlying file system. Should
> + * look it up, either on fallthru
> + * creation at first readdir or now at
> + * filldir time. */
> + over = filldir(dirent, de->name, de->name_len,
> + (n<<PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT) | offset,
> + 123 /* Made up ino */, d_type);
I don't think it makes sense to use "123" for the inode number. This is a valid inode number, and almost certainly one that will be in use in most filesystems. One option for extN is to use EXT2_BAD_INO (1).
Cheers, Andreas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists