[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <2076374F-7C3C-4A4A-831C-3BD698A90E69@dilger.ca>
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2010 18:47:52 -0600
From: Andreas Dilger <adilger@...ger.ca>
To: andreas@...-net.de
Cc: Greg Freemyer <greg.freemyer@...il.com>, k-mio@...jp.nec.com,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: defragmentation of boot related files
On 2010-08-26, at 14:16, andreas@...-net.de wrote:
>>> Usage: e4defrag -r directory...| device...
>>> e4defrag -r base_file move_file...<--- new
>>>
>
> The new interface looks nice. As I see it's easy to implement cause only the main-function must be modified. If you have no objections, I will do it myself and send you the patch to review it.
>
>> I suspect the original idea would work better because it is more
>> likely to pack the libs / files into perfectly contiguous block
>> ranges.
>
> I don't know if it makes a difference for the block allocator. Even though you know the size of all files to be moved.
>
> For a better result, may it be possible to create a base_file whose inode is part of an empty block group?
There is a /proc/fs/ext4/*/inode_goal that will cause new inodes allocated in the filesystem to be after the specified goal inode.
I suppose it would also be possible to have e4defrag simply take an inode number in the form "<inode_number>" in place of "base_file", as debugfs does.
Cheers, Andreas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists